Some stuff I found : the opening credits of the color Riggs have different titles placements from the original series when compared to both the A&E masters and the old VHS airings (some you can find on youtube).
Also, the footage is framed too wide in many shots. I wonder if they redid them. You can see it clearly on the producers credits, where Brian Clemens credits have dropped a bit (it was previously closer to Albert Fennell credit).
Funny bit.
The Avengers in widescreen?
- Alan
- Diabolical Mastermind
- Posts: 2967
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:51 pm
- Location: The Edge of Avengerland
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
Fascinating and very acceptable.seventeen wrote:Here's a demo comparison between 4:3 and 16:9 that I'm sure many of you will find interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNf7f44pAb4
Note that it was made possible because in that particular instance, the whole of the frame is accidentaly revealed on the Optimum master, including all the space top and bottom never intended to be seen in 4:3.
- dissolute
- The Ministry
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:03 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
- Contact:
I would still rather see the full frame and, as I've written before, have the 1.33:1 as a different 'angle' on the DVD (or, if you're fussy, 1.33 as the default angle and full frame as the option).
The chances of us knowing what the framing at the time was, now (unless you get your hands on a broadcast print), is close to zero. Every print I've ever seen of "How to Succeed" has that foot in frame.
Actually, I might still have my recordings of the Australian broadcast prints for series 5 but no longer have a VHS player.
I've recorded some of the reruns digitally, so I'll check them out and post some screenshots.
The chances of us knowing what the framing at the time was, now (unless you get your hands on a broadcast print), is close to zero. Every print I've ever seen of "How to Succeed" has that foot in frame.
Actually, I might still have my recordings of the Australian broadcast prints for series 5 but no longer have a VHS player.
I've recorded some of the reruns digitally, so I'll check them out and post some screenshots.
Mrs Peel, you're needed!
http://www.dissolute.com.au/the-avengers-tv-series/
Every episode from 1961 to 1977 plus more trivia than you can shake a brolly at.
http://www.dissolute.com.au/the-avengers-tv-series/
Every episode from 1961 to 1977 plus more trivia than you can shake a brolly at.
On the contrary, the viewfinder tell us what the intended for TV framing was.dissolute wrote:The chances of us knowing what the framing at the time was, now (unless you get your hands on a broadcast print), is close to zero. Every print I've ever seen of "How to Succeed" has that foot in frame.
That would have to be a VHS recording from the 70's, not anything from the 80's onward where the show was already on broacast tapes. However that could be good to check for the color timing.Actually, I might still have my recordings of the Australian broadcast prints for series 5 but no longer have a VHS player.
I've recorded some of the reruns digitally, so I'll check them out and post some screenshots.
- dissolute
- The Ministry
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:03 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 203 times
- Contact:
The Australian broadcast masters have been in use since '68 (and show it!)
I'll see what I can dig out.
I'll see what I can dig out.
Mrs Peel, you're needed!
http://www.dissolute.com.au/the-avengers-tv-series/
Every episode from 1961 to 1977 plus more trivia than you can shake a brolly at.
http://www.dissolute.com.au/the-avengers-tv-series/
Every episode from 1961 to 1977 plus more trivia than you can shake a brolly at.
Check out the tight framing on the french opening credits, it's very interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTjaLsmwDb4
The top and bottom framing correspond exactly to the one you would have if you would crop the current set to 1.66:1.
I think there were over the years two sets of english credits because the placements of the credits over the footage change. Also, one set, the one currently used, shows at the moment the cork pops something on the left bottom side of the frame that looks like someone who is pulling the cork, or move out of frame. You can see it clearly on a computer viewing the DVD.
This blunder is on french copies from the time the series re-aired in 1987. It was never on the old, 16mm prints like this one above.
You can see something is off on the Optimum remasters on this opening, because when the Emma Credits comes, she is unbelievably low in the frame (ie her heads top at the two thirds of the frame maximum, when she on the old credits tops at the "common top" invisible line.
There's also the geometry of the framing on the shadows when they are at the table and Steed moves in to fill the glass. It's perfectly balanced on the old french print framing, but it's totally off on the new Optimum version.
Finally, when Steed puts on his hat, there's an editing double action on the french credits set, Steed makes the same move adjusting the hat, twice, in two different shots.
The current set uses the same angles, but Steed only adjust his hat once. Anyone noticed?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTjaLsmwDb4
The top and bottom framing correspond exactly to the one you would have if you would crop the current set to 1.66:1.
I think there were over the years two sets of english credits because the placements of the credits over the footage change. Also, one set, the one currently used, shows at the moment the cork pops something on the left bottom side of the frame that looks like someone who is pulling the cork, or move out of frame. You can see it clearly on a computer viewing the DVD.
This blunder is on french copies from the time the series re-aired in 1987. It was never on the old, 16mm prints like this one above.
You can see something is off on the Optimum remasters on this opening, because when the Emma Credits comes, she is unbelievably low in the frame (ie her heads top at the two thirds of the frame maximum, when she on the old credits tops at the "common top" invisible line.
There's also the geometry of the framing on the shadows when they are at the table and Steed moves in to fill the glass. It's perfectly balanced on the old french print framing, but it's totally off on the new Optimum version.
Finally, when Steed puts on his hat, there's an editing double action on the french credits set, Steed makes the same move adjusting the hat, twice, in two different shots.
The current set uses the same angles, but Steed only adjust his hat once. Anyone noticed?