6.08 - My Wildest Dream

Rate 'My Wildest Dream'

10
3
21%
9
2
14%
8
5
36%
7
0
No votes
6
1
7%
5
1
7%
4
2
14%
3
0
No votes
2
0
No votes
1
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 14

User avatar
darren
Diabolical Mastermind
Posts: 2113
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: UK
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Post by darren »

As I point out in the chapter I'm writing for our season 6 book, there's a scene where Steed gets very angry with a humorous character, Dr. Reece. There are moments in the two Charles Crichton directed episodes, False Witness and Interrogators where Steed manhandles those who innocent of their wrong doing (through drugs or being duped).

He does become the straight man in season 6 but he is t without the lighter moments. But Macnee carries it off very convincingly. I think we often undervalue how good he was. Take Over is a very powerful episode thanks to Macnee's intensity and Steed getting so beaten down in the quest for survival, no arched eyebrow raised to the danger in that one!
Lhbizness

Post by Lhbizness »

Darren wrote:As I point out in the chapter I'm writing for our season 6 book, there's a scene where Steed gets very angry with a humorous character, Dr. Reece. There are moments in the two Charles Crichton directed episodes, False Witness and Interrogators where Steed manhandles those who innocent of their wrong doing (through drugs or being duped).

He does become the straight man in season 6 but he is t without the lighter moments. But Macnee carries it off very convincingly. I think we often undervalue how good he was. Take Over is a very powerful episode thanks to Macnee's intensity and Steed getting so beaten down in the quest for survival, no arched eyebrow raised to the danger in that one!
True - and on the one hand, I like the shift in character in some ways. He takes things more seriously and at times (like in Take Over) it suits the subject matter. If the plots were a little more serious, it probably wouldn't jar as much. But you've got people tainting milk bottles with hallucinogens and "aggresso-therapists" convincing men to murder their work colleagues. It's not even James Bond-level serious.

But it's rough that the comedic center of the series appears to have lost much of his humor, and even become more violent. Whatever you feel about Tara, she's rarely a funny or arch character, so the only proper comic relief comes from the situations, which are largely ludicrous. Part of what made The Avengers work so well was that cocked eyebrow - while the masterminds take things very seriously, the heroes think it's all kind of funny. That's not completely lost in Season 6, but much of the spark has gone out of Steed.

Don't know if this was an effect from America - it's not exactly like American shows/films of the same period didn't tend towards camp. Given that The Avengers folded partially because of disinterest from US audiences, it appears to have backfired.
User avatar
Frankymole
You Have Just Been Posting (a lot)
Posts: 6535
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:33 am
Location: Carmadoc Research Establishment
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Post by Frankymole »

I dunno, Cathy Gale usually took the threats very seriously and wasn't all "arched eyebrow".

If the Avengers had to be like "Rowan and Martin's Laugh In" to succeed, perhaps it's better it came second to that show.
Last watched: "Mandrake"
Lhbizness

Post by Lhbizness »

Naw, I'd say that Cathy found a lot of the villains kind of laughable, particularly in the third season. There was always that edge of humor and lack of belief. Again, though, it's not a hard and fast "this is always the way it is, forever and ever, all the time." I was thinking more in reference to Steed's character and the shift in Season 6.

But...didn't you just say that the series became more serious to appease American audiences? Which, given the success of the 4/5 seasons that did contain more of that archness and humor, at least on the part of our leading man, was probably a bad move (if true).
User avatar
Frankymole
You Have Just Been Posting (a lot)
Posts: 6535
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:33 am
Location: Carmadoc Research Establishment
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Post by Frankymole »

The success or otherwise in the States was down to scheduling, not content.
Last watched: "Mandrake"
Lhbizness

Post by Lhbizness »

I'm sorry, but I'm sure that content - the change of a leading lady, which regardless of how good or bad it was, can still put people off who have become accustomed to a certain format - must have had something to do with it. There's no way to determine if that's a correct assessment, of course. But if, as you've claimed, the initially broadcast Tara episodes were not of the highest calibre due to production upheaval, I can imagine a number of viewers defecting simply because it no longer looked like a show they wanted to watch.

Anyways, it doesn't much matter to what we have now. I was just responding to the concept of going serious to appease the US, which if that was the intention still didn't do much. Regardless, they DID go serious, and in my opinion it sometimes jars with the otherwise outlandishness of the plots.
User avatar
Frankymole
You Have Just Been Posting (a lot)
Posts: 6535
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:33 am
Location: Carmadoc Research Establishment
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Post by Frankymole »

Lhbizness wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm sure that content - the change of a leading lady, which regardless of how good or bad it was, can still put people off who have become accustomed to a certain format - must have had something to do with it. There's no way to determine if that's a correct assessment, of course. But if, as you've claimed, the initially broadcast Tara episodes were not of the highest calibre due to production upheaval, I can imagine a number of viewers defecting simply because it no longer looked like a show they wanted to watch.
They weren't broadcast in production order, though. Stuff happened like "My Wildest Dream" being held back 9 months, and the order was generally juggled a fair bit - it's not TV practice to put "weaker" episodes out together. Emma Peel also benefitted from this practice :)

Looking at the airdates, I see that as well as Brimstone being "banned", Honey for the Prince was also "not aired" in the 60s (at least in NYC which is where I have dates for). Presumably because Emma's "seven veils" costume broke the broadcast rules? Somehow her "Castle De'Ath" breach of the rules (navel showing) got through...
Last watched: "Mandrake"
Lhbizness

Post by Lhbizness »

I was really just basing it on what has been said before on this forum - that the initial Tara episodes (including the Forget-Me-Knot) were not the highest calibre of the Tara episodes, and they were broadcast first (regardless of production order, which certainly Tara suffered from in terms of her character development). So it isn't a stretch to guess - again, without any direct evidence of audience reception - that the combination of a new leading lady, an upheaval of sorts in the format, and placing The Avengers up against a popular series would result in a decline in American popularity. That's not a slur on Tara or Season 6; it's just an unfortunate combination of events.
User avatar
Rhonda
Epic
Posts: 922
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:49 am
Location: A town, UK
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Post by Rhonda »

4 from me. Like Tara's flat.
Ron
Last Watched : Angels Of Death
mariocki
How to Succeed... at Posting!
Posts: 546
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:21 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Post by mariocki »

Went to see Peter Vaughan today - not doing too badly for 93!

Image

Image
"No ma'm, I'm a Texan."
Post Reply